2009/1/4 <unspa****@hushm*****>: > On Sun, 04 Jan 2009 20:36:07 +0100 Szymon G > <sz.g.****@googl*****> wrote: >>anyway, this is what i wanted to send: >>(..) > > If you look closely the difference between originals and rejects > aren't that different. Patching a clean kernel source with CCS > (before GRSec) should show the patches get added perfectly. > Probably the GRSecurity patch messed up some newlines. > > As far as I can see the only thing that needs some more attention > is the af_unix.c.rej, but if you read the original code next to the > reject you'll probably be able to insert the missing lines manually. > > > Regards, unSpawn hm... i've asked a friend of mine about help /he knows *a bit* more than i/, he get some errors. he will look closer on it tomorrow (i hope ;p)- so, in case of problems, i'll send more messages later. anyway, i hope it will be working together fine. > > * BTW, if you don't mind me asking, what is it you use TOMOYO > mainly for? well... i dont mind asking :> i'm not running any server, i dont have any computer-related job, i wanna check it just becouse I'm courious about it... i'm a bit interested in computers' safety, especially in apparmor/tomoyo-like systems (well... i just cant get selinux :/) your sincerely szymon
TOMOYO
Fork